multiple instances of player on one page?

May 28, 2009 at 4:46 PM

hey all

first just wanted to say that the player is great

the video looks clean and the ui does so much


so now because i like it so much

id like to put multiple vids on one page

ive got the player in a .ascx control and just stamp out the control on the page depending on the number of vids in the db

the first instance of the player comes up totally fine

the rest of them are just a black frame


has anyone made multiple instances work?



Jun 2, 2009 at 4:18 PM


can anyone refute or support?




Jun 2, 2009 at 4:23 PM

If you look at the network traffic do you see the videos being loaded?  How many are you adding?  The player is optimized for one view really...we haven't done much testing with multiple on a single page.  It should work, but there will also be likely network performance issues because your page will be downloading multiple videos at one time.  Browser network limitations usually only allow up to 2 requests simultaneously to the same server at one time.  This could be your issue.


Jun 2, 2009 at 4:28 PM

hey tim

thanks for the quick reply

i realise that download requests are limited to 2

but it only ever does one even after the 1st download is finished


and to add insult to injury

ive just been experimenting with another player which isnt quite as pretty as this one

and it does the multi-player just fine


is there a quick solution?

or can i get  a confirmation on this ?

(if i can i will put in a feature request)


Jun 2, 2009 at 4:33 PM

Do you have a sample page we can look at?  and what other player is working fine so we can investigate differences?

Jun 2, 2009 at 4:43 PM

hey tim

ive just built you up two pages to compare


this mino player is here





Jun 2, 2009 at 7:50 PM

Got it.  It does have to do with the progressive download of the videos.  Our loading sequence is likely blocking showing any UI until the video is loaded (or enough to start playing).  I'll have to take a look at it.

Jun 2, 2009 at 7:51 PM
This discussion has been copied to a work item. Click here to go to the work item and continue the discussion.